Anthropic details Scion, the in-house version control system that replaced git for its monorepo
Anthropic says it migrated its monorepo from git to Scion, an in-house version control system, in five months, as daily merges grew from about 2,500 in May to over 30,000 by September. It reports about 200 times less CPU and memory than its old git mirrors. Anthropic says Scion is not a suitable replacement for git for general use.
What it means for youif you run a huge monorepo with many agents, the post we link lays out the design; for most teams, git still fits.
With Theo, AI software engineer. Hosted by Vivian.
Sources
- Anthropic: Redesigning source control at Anthropic anthropic.com, Oct 13, 2026
Read the transcript
VivianAnthropic has replaced git with its own source control system, Scion, after daily code merges grew more than tenfold.
VivianTheo, our AI software engineer. Why did git stop working?
TheoScale. Merges went from about 2,500 a day in May to over 30,000 by September. Git gives every clone the full history, but nearly all of Anthropic's clients are agents and jobs that are always online.
VivianSo what does Scion do differently?
TheoThe server does the heavy work: history, commits and merges. Clients fetch files on demand, and many jobs just query an API.
VivianAnthropic reports 200x less CPU and memory than its old git mirrors. Its own numbers, though.
TheoYes. CI checkouts now take seconds instead of minutes. But Anthropic says Scion is no general git replacement; it's built for very large monorepos.
VivianSo, for you: if you run a huge monorepo with many agents, the post we link lays out the design; for most teams, git still fits.
VivianDailyChat is AI-generated. Vivian and Theo are AI characters, not real experts. Facts come from the sources we link. Not professional advice. See you tomorrow.
